Did you see the number of people at the Sussex Christmas parade? Main Street looked very impressive with the Christmas lights, music, people, and the parade. Kids were laughing and having fun and adults were all chatting and from time to time warning the kids not to play in the street. It was a great evening of family entertainment.
For those who feel I'm overly positive and never create enough controversy in my writing...guess what? I wasn't completely happy with the parade. Don't get me wrong. I loved the parade. My discontent stems from the people who feel the need to parallel park, on a crosswalk, and leave the car running for the entire parade. Onlookers of the parade were essentially forced to breath in the fumes the car was putting out. I think the Town should consider a parking ban during the parade or consider a section where if you need to, you can park and idle if needed. For me that isn't a great option because of the environmental impact.
Really why would anyone really need to idle their car for the entire parade? The car doesn't get that cold over the hour long event. If it does, pack more blankets so you'll be warm enough.
Just so I don't leave this on a bad note, I want to tip my hat to the Town of Sussex. Well done with the one exception which I don't feel you should have to address, people should know better.
Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts
Monday, December 3, 2012
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
A Bit of a Pet Peeve
I was driving down Main Street in Sussex today and witnessed something that frustrated me. I was driving my work truck with the Kennebecasis Watershed Restoration Committee magnets on the side. If it was the first time this summer I had seen this it might not have bothered me so bad but this was the third time. If I had a more confrontational personality this environmental crime would not have gone unpunished. Luckily for the woman committing the crime I let it go, after all, it is not actually criminal but in my opinion it should be.
So what did she, and two others, do that frustrated me? She was emptying out a bucket of wash water directly into the storm drain. So why should this be an environmental crime? Well, when you empty anything directly into the storm drain it usually has a direct path to a natural stream or river. This means what ever grease and oil you cleaned off your car, windows, or whatever and throw down the storm drain it could potentially pollute your nearby stream. If every one did this can you imagine the impact. Who knows what was in the bucket the lady emptied out but even the cleaners you might use are harmful to water quality and fish and other aquatic species.
Even when we park our cars at the grocery store, if we have fluids leaking, they will find their way into the storm drains and then into the rivers. Next time when you're in a large parking lot find a storm grate and look around for the telltale sheen of oil following the low drainage areas of the parking lot. Then look at all the cars in the lot and consider if every car leaked how much oil or gas that could be entering the local streams.
There are programs that try to draw attention to this issue but the results are hard to quantify and so to is the impact that such actions have. As for a car leaking fluids, I know it is next to impossible to stop, but if you can keep your car tuned up to reduce such leaks. Every bit helps.
So what did she, and two others, do that frustrated me? She was emptying out a bucket of wash water directly into the storm drain. So why should this be an environmental crime? Well, when you empty anything directly into the storm drain it usually has a direct path to a natural stream or river. This means what ever grease and oil you cleaned off your car, windows, or whatever and throw down the storm drain it could potentially pollute your nearby stream. If every one did this can you imagine the impact. Who knows what was in the bucket the lady emptied out but even the cleaners you might use are harmful to water quality and fish and other aquatic species.
Even when we park our cars at the grocery store, if we have fluids leaking, they will find their way into the storm drains and then into the rivers. Next time when you're in a large parking lot find a storm grate and look around for the telltale sheen of oil following the low drainage areas of the parking lot. Then look at all the cars in the lot and consider if every car leaked how much oil or gas that could be entering the local streams.
There are programs that try to draw attention to this issue but the results are hard to quantify and so to is the impact that such actions have. As for a car leaking fluids, I know it is next to impossible to stop, but if you can keep your car tuned up to reduce such leaks. Every bit helps.
Labels:
environment,
Sussex,
waste water,
watershed
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Praise for an Undervalued Natural Gem
This edition of Wandering was published in the Kings County Record recently. It has a slight political tone and that was intentional. Historically Parson's Brook has been beaten by man and yet it continues to provide a beneficial ecological function to the two municipalities it runs through. One of these has taken steps to protect it while the other community continues to pursue and allow activities that impact this nice brook. This could be a brook near you so ask yourself, how can you protect yourself and that aquatic system.
Nature is a magnificent thing. It is full of inspiration on multiple scales. From watching a small butterfly flutter over a rushing river, to a massive and impressive rock face your eyes can hardly take in. The ear pounding crash of thunder or the deafening silence of a tranquil sunset each inspire even the most disheartened soul. With that being said, many people undervalue many parts of our natural world.
Parson's Brook, which flows along the same valley as the Newline Road, is likely one of the most under valued natural assets we have in Kings County . It flows approximately 8k from its source near the junction of the Newline Road and Church Avenue. It crosses the Newline three times before taking a turn to the northwest. From here it flows over the flat agricultural lands that make up the southern portion of Sussex Corner before entering into the old rifle range and the Town of Sussex . It takes a final turn north, crosses under Main Street, before entering Trout Creek.
It hasn't always flowed that way though. Many years ago it was altered to make room for a horse track near where the Sussex Corner Elementary School now sits. Shortly after this change was made, the lower part of the Brook started drying up during the summer months. The water instead chooses a path through the deep, coarse gravel deposits as its route to Trout Creek. This fact has led many people to perceive Parson's Brook as simply a ditch and many treat it as such.
To me this unheralded Brook is a testimony to nature's resilience against many of the scars man thrusts upon it. Parson's Brook had its entire course changed and when it starts to settle into its new course, someone decides to dredge it, or alter it once again. Parson's Brook keeps searching for its natural course though and every spring, and sometimes in the fall, it flows fast and furious through the man made channel, trying to cut a channel that will allow it to function as it naturally should.
The fish in Parson's Brook are as resilient as the Brook itself. With elevated stream temperatures, pollution, and passage barriers it is surprising that any fish live in this stream at all but anyone who has walked the Brook above any of its crossings on the Newline Road can attest that fish, including brook trout, are there. On one occasion I was incredibly surprised when I entered the Brook at a deep pool and it was so full of fish that they couldn't scatter without a number of them solidly running into me.
Recently I took sometime to observe some of the smaller components of Parson's Brook. I come to realize that it deserves more respect than what many give it. If we leave it alone and give it its space it would eventually function as it should. With a healthy, vegetated, stream bank or riparian zone it could effectively mitigate the impacts of flooding. The naturally functioning riparian area would also prevent pollution and litter from entering the stream while also serving as migration corridors for deer, fox, birds, and other wildlife. This natural corridor could also provide the active community with a new hiking or biking trail that would be ideal for people of all skill sets as it is relatively flat.
Labels:
environment,
Kings County,
waterfalls,
watershed
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Ranting on Fisheries
I typically don't use my blog as a venue for ranting but on this occasion I can't keep it to myself. Recently there has been talk, and numerous newspaper articles, about the position of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Apparently they wish to slim down the fisheries act so that permit application processes are completed in a more timely fashion and so that fewer projects will trigger the need for a Canadian Environmental Impact Assessment. That information (no official statement has been given on this) alone would not usually send me into a rant but on the same night I heard this I happened to watch the documentary movie "The Last Mountain." I'll let you watch this on your own and form your own opinion, but I think it was a well presented movie.
In Ottawa the Conservatives are apparently comparing "environmentalists" to al Qaeda or the Taliban quotes the "Ottawa Citizen." What?! First off, I have been long unimpressed with the way in which people throw the word "environment" around. In most Environmental Assessment documents it will state something to the effect that the purpose of the assessment is to ensure the project will not have a minimal impact on the local economic, societal, and ecological values. If you then take environment to mean those three values then I suppose those in power in Ottawa might have an argument on one of the three and only if they are looking no farther than their own nose.
Environmental assessments generally assess the current conditions in a community, its long term sustainability, and its ability to provide a healthy environment for its residents to prosper for many generations comparing the current assets to those that might (stress might when reading this) develop if large projects are carried out. In my opinion, the economic component of the assessment is given to much weight, and not enough weight is given to the natural environment or ecological function of the project area.
If DFO moves forward with the plans to streamline the Fisheries act then this set of environmental scales will be tipped even further towards the economic values. These will likely only lead to short term economic gains for a small portion of the impacted population while the rest will likely suffer. In the long term, all involved will no doubt suffer from poor water quality, poor ecological conditions that will lead to health issues, and further to that a project might result in an environmental accident that we will be required to clean up using tax payer dollars.
I'm not against business and if I was all about making money for myself then I wouldn't blame them but, our government should hold them morally accountable for the manner in which they make their money. If they want to make money simply for themselves then waiting for our government, who has a responsibility to all tax payers, to conduct an environmental assessment, should be no issue. For those of us who are not totally dependent on financial wealth for our sense of accomplishment, and for those who care about future generations, I think it is time to let your MP know how you feel. Write him/her an email or letter and if you need help finding them try this link: http://www.parl.gc.ca/Parlinfo/Compilations/HouseOfCommons/MemberByPostalCode.aspx?Menu=HOC
The DFO website states:
I have a hard time with the statement in that I can't believe that Canadians don't want to protect their natural beauty and habitats. I think most Canadians realize that if we manage our waterways for simply one or two species of fish then they are no longer a naturally functioning waterway and that the ecological balance within that watershed could be threatened which could lead to who knows what. Further, flooded fields and ditches, in many instances play a role in the life cycles of many fish and animal species and need to be considered on a case by case basis, but if we dismiss them all then it is like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
If our MPs feel that the economics, rather than our long term future, is more important then it is likely the changes being suggested to the fisheries act, and possibly other environmental laws, will be carried out. If you want your kids or grandkids to have an opportunity to fly fish for a salmon this might be a turning point in that natural battle or as some are touting it, war.
In Ottawa the Conservatives are apparently comparing "environmentalists" to al Qaeda or the Taliban quotes the "Ottawa Citizen." What?! First off, I have been long unimpressed with the way in which people throw the word "environment" around. In most Environmental Assessment documents it will state something to the effect that the purpose of the assessment is to ensure the project will not have a minimal impact on the local economic, societal, and ecological values. If you then take environment to mean those three values then I suppose those in power in Ottawa might have an argument on one of the three and only if they are looking no farther than their own nose.
Environmental assessments generally assess the current conditions in a community, its long term sustainability, and its ability to provide a healthy environment for its residents to prosper for many generations comparing the current assets to those that might (stress might when reading this) develop if large projects are carried out. In my opinion, the economic component of the assessment is given to much weight, and not enough weight is given to the natural environment or ecological function of the project area.
If DFO moves forward with the plans to streamline the Fisheries act then this set of environmental scales will be tipped even further towards the economic values. These will likely only lead to short term economic gains for a small portion of the impacted population while the rest will likely suffer. In the long term, all involved will no doubt suffer from poor water quality, poor ecological conditions that will lead to health issues, and further to that a project might result in an environmental accident that we will be required to clean up using tax payer dollars.
I'm not against business and if I was all about making money for myself then I wouldn't blame them but, our government should hold them morally accountable for the manner in which they make their money. If they want to make money simply for themselves then waiting for our government, who has a responsibility to all tax payers, to conduct an environmental assessment, should be no issue. For those of us who are not totally dependent on financial wealth for our sense of accomplishment, and for those who care about future generations, I think it is time to let your MP know how you feel. Write him/her an email or letter and if you need help finding them try this link: http://www.parl.gc.ca/Parlinfo/Compilations/HouseOfCommons/MemberByPostalCode.aspx?Menu=HOC
The DFO website states:
“The government has been clear that the existing policies do
not reflect the priorities of
Canadians."
“We want to
focus our activities on protecting natural waterways that are home to the fish
Canadians value most instead of on flooded fields and ditches.”
If our MPs feel that the economics, rather than our long term future, is more important then it is likely the changes being suggested to the fisheries act, and possibly other environmental laws, will be carried out. If you want your kids or grandkids to have an opportunity to fly fish for a salmon this might be a turning point in that natural battle or as some are touting it, war.
Labels:
ecology,
environment,
Environmental Impact Assessment,
Fisheries,
fishing,
politics,
rant,
regulations,
salmon
Friday, June 17, 2011
The Recreation and Environment Link
Note: This is a version of a column I had appear in the Kings County Record recently. I associate very closely with this one and feel incredibly blessed to live where I do, in a place where recreational opportunities can be found around every corner. The upper Kennebecasis Watershed is a beautiful blend of thriving rural communities, bustling small town centers, and wide open spaces. It maybe that this rural flavor has allowed the area to thrive during a time when other parts of the country are claiming hard times. I have to ask myself "Do we need to boost our economy and compete on a global market? Are we broken? Do we need to exploit our natural resources to survive?" My answer usually comes to me as I wander down one of the beautiful rivers here in a resounding "No!" With a healthy environment and recreational opportunities comes a happy and healthy community...what more do we need? As you read this consider that the small piece of litter someone throws could represent any industry or individual causing environmental harm, we are all in this together, so lets all step up.
Wow…what do I write about this week? Unlike the spring weather which has gotten off to a slow start, my spring has been anything but. This is due in big part to my kids. Thanks guys. We have tented out for a night, been fishing on the Trout Creek, hit just about every playground in the Sussex area, played baseball and soccer, went geo-caching, roasted some marshmallows, and the first big family camping trip is just around the corner.
All this activity got me thinking, why is the Sussex area so blessed with great recreation outlets? As I continued to think about it I realized that it is likely due in good part to the healthy state of the local environment. Without fish in the streams it is safe to say no one would enjoy fishing. With poor air quality playing baseball or soccer would be less enjoyable and less healthy. If our forests were disconnected or were a continuous monoculture hiking would be less entertaining and not nearly as enjoyable. If our parks were poorly planned and our sports facilities were improperly maintained it is likely that they would not generate the needed revenue to be sustainable.
We are blessed to live in such a prosperous part of the world. It would be a shame to see our recreation opportunities diminish simply because we did not show enough thought to our environment. Many organizations are now striving to increase the publicly perceived value of the environment through recreational outings that also provide an education and outreach opportunity. Fundy National Park for instance recently hosted their "Wings Over Fundy" bird watching event and also have incorporated ecosystem education in a geo-caching series they introduced about three years ago.
The idea of education through recreation provides the public with an enjoyable afternoon where they learn about the environment without even realizing that they are learning. With a relaxed mind set they no doubt take in much more than if they were sitting in a class room. Granted some people learn better when focused on specific topics so for those people there is the movement towards "citizen science." This is where organizations organize volunteers to observe conditions, gather data, identify characteristics, or even take samples. While the data may not be considered scientifically valid, it still provides excellent background data for planning and prioritization exercises by the various organizations using it, and the events are excellent outreach and educational tools.
Environmental conservation is everyone's responsibility and if we take a negative action towards the environment it potentially impacts everyone. Take for example someone using the walking trail in Sussex. If he throws litter into a nearby ditch it eventually ends up in the Trout Creek and then the Kennebecasis River and eventually into the Bay of Fundy. The Bay could be considered the driving engine to New Brunswick. It is the backbone of our tourism industry, it contributes largely to the fisheries, and affects the local weather that highly influences the climate that grows our trees for forestry. If we continue to litter in it we lose the Bay, our economy, our Province, and maybe most importantly our recreation opportunities.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Scooby Doo Effect of Wetlands
![]() |
| This wetland near Salt Springs was very photogenic |
There are very few places in the wilderness were I feel uneasy and honestly I am a bit embarrassed to let you in on this here. Recently there has been a great deal of discussion on protecting these areas in New Brunswick and, even as a conservationist, I'm not sure how I feel about it. So where is this place that makes my skin tingle and the hair stand on the back of my neck? If you're there you can smell its moisture laden vegetation and soil. You can feel the softness of the ground as it almost moves under you. As you pause you would likely hear the gurgle of water beneath you as the mud starts to give way under your feet. As you look around you will notice the various grasses and shrubs and the large diversity of all things including bugs.
Wetlands are an inspiring place so I have no idea why they make me feel so uncomfortable. I spend a great deal of time in wet habitat but for some reason I have always felt odd when it wetlands. I have an elevated fear level when in wetlands and often feel like what you might when you walk through a cemetery. You know there is really nothing there but for some reason you can't shake the feeling that someone is watching you. Despite this fear I love exploring wetlands.
The different types of wetlands alone are impressive but add to that diversity the diversity in which you can find when you take the time to get wet and dirty they really can blow you away. The number of bugs, grasses and flowering plants, mammals that depend on the existence of such ecosystems, and the birds are always present.
Wetland beauty and value does not end with its diversity and aesthetic wonder. Wetlands are a valuable component in maintaining hydrologic balances. They hold water until it is needed, they purify water and keep it clean for consumption by animals, including humans, and they slow the release of flood waters during times of water abundance. Take a wetland out of the ecological equation and the entire natural system would fall apart. Fish would no longer have clean water to swim in if they had enough water to swim in at all. As nice as it might sound many bug populations, including mosquitoes, would likely crash and subsequently many flower and bird populations would also suffer.
![]() |
| This wetland area has all the makings for a horror flick. |
The diversity within a wetland is likely one of the reasons I feel uncomfortable there. I could never become familiar with a wetland as there is simply to much to take in, even in a small woodland bog. Maybe I shouldn't have watched "Scooby Doo" so much as a child because honestly I think I believe in the marsh monster. I keep waiting for him to jump out of the open water holes and get me. Good thing that wetlands are not that diverse.
Friday, October 22, 2010
Roots with a Purpose
I have been researching a lot lately as I have been starting to prepare funding proposals at work. I have been digging up some cool facts on trees and the role they play in nature. I find it interesting that we seldom notice trees until fall when they provide us with a colorful canvas. Trees are so much more than a part of the landscape, they are the fabric that holds the balance of earth in the air. For me I often utilize trees to improve riparian areas which in turn improves watershed health. I see daily how valuable they are to water quality and the relation they have with aquatic ecosystems.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



